About Simon
A group of scientists take Simon, a psychology professor, as a test person for a brainwashing experiment and try to convince him that he is a living being from another planet.
Marshall Brickman’s 1980 directorial debut Simon occupies a fascinating space in the landscape of American satirical cinema, arriving as a sharp critique of the intellectual vanity that defined the late seventies. While Indian cinema often leans into grand mythological storytelling or high-octane action to explore identity, this film takes a more clinical, absurdist approach to the same theme. It centers on a gullible psychology professor who finds himself the unwitting subject of a bizarre laboratory deception, where a collective of researchers attempts to gaslight him into believing he is an extraterrestrial visitor. This premise serves as a Trojan horse for a much deeper investigation into how easily human identity can be manipulated by those wielding the machinery of science and media. For viewers who appreciate the biting wit found in cult classics or the dark humor of contemporary black comedies, the film offers a refreshing, albeit cynical, look at the fragility of ego.
The narrative functions as a bridge between the introspective dramas of the seventies and the high-concept satire that would dominate the following decade. By presenting the protagonist as a man of logic who is stripped of his rational foundation, the film challenges the audience to consider the permeability of their own beliefs. It is a work that feels particularly relevant in our current era of post-truth discourse, where the line between manufactured reality and authentic experience becomes increasingly blurred. Those who enjoy cerebral films that prioritize dialogue and conceptual play over visual spectacle will find this a rewarding watch. It stands out from typical genre fare because it chooses to laugh at the absurdity of authority figures rather than leaning into the tropes of space-age spectacle or cosmic horror.
For fans of global cinema who frequently dive into the nuanced character studies of the Malayalam or Telugu industries, the structure here may feel familiar in its dedication to a single, character-driven conceit. It is not interested in expanding its world beyond the confines of its primary experiment, keeping the focus squarely on the psychological unraveling of the lead. The performance driving the film anchors these wild ideas, grounding the absurdity in a believable, if pathetic, human reaction to institutional betrayal. As an early example of the brainwashing trope used for comedic rather than thriller purposes, it remains a distinct entry in the history of independent filmmaking. It is a essential recommendation for anyone interested in the evolution of the mad scientist archetype, stripped of its gothic sensibilities and replaced with the cold, sterile humor of the modern office environment.
Cast(64)
